| Specification | RIVER 2 Pro 768Wh +220W Panel | SOLIX F3000 3072Wh | 🏆 Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity (Wh) | 768.0 Wh | 3072.0 Wh | Anker SOLIX |
| Weight | 39 lbs | 91.49 lbs | EcoFlow |
| Max Solar Input | 220W | 200W | EcoFlow |
| AC Output | 800W | 6000W | Anker SOLIX |
| Battery Type | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 | Tie |
| ⚡ Usable Capacity (85%) | 653 Wh | 2611 Wh | Anker SOLIX |
| 💰 Value (Wh/$) | 1.40 | 2.19 | Anker SOLIX |
| ⚡ Charge Speed (Wh/min) | 9.2 | 7.2 | EcoFlow |
* Based on 85% inverter efficiency. Devices shown on bars.
| Use Case | RIVER 2 Pro 768Wh +220W Panel | SOLIX F3000 3072Wh | 🏆 Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏕️ Camping | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | EcoFlow |
| 🚐 RV / Van | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Anker SOLIX |
| 🏠 Home Backup | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Anker SOLIX |
🔬 Capacity & Efficiency: EcoFlow offers 768.0Wh (usable ~653Wh), while Anker SOLIX provides 3072.0Wh (usable ~2611Wh). Anker SOLIX holds the capacity advantage.
⚡ Charging Speed: EcoFlow charges at ~9.2 Wh/min, Anker SOLIX at ~7.2 Wh/min. EcoFlow refuels faster.
💰 Value Analysis: EcoFlow delivers 1.40 Wh/$, Anker SOLIX gives 2.19 Wh/$. Anker SOLIX offers more watt-hours per dollar.
🏆 Verdict: This comparison is uniquely generated for EcoFlow vs Anker SOLIX. Consider your priorities: capacity, speed, or value.
🔁 People also compared (2026 Popular Comparisons):
📌 All links lead to internal comparisons with 2026 lab data.