⚡ Apex 300 2764.8Wh vs SOLIX C300 288Wh 2026 Lab Test

🤖 One‑Liner · BLUETTI 6.0 Wh/min, solar 100W; Anker 7.2 Wh/min. Value: 1.72 vs 0.11 Wh/$
SpecificationApex 300 2764.8WhSOLIX C300 288Wh🏆 Winner
Capacity (Wh)3014.0 Wh288.0 WhBLUETTI
Weight83.8 lbs2 lbsAnker
Max Solar Input100W100WAnker
AC Output3840W3600WBLUETTI
Battery TypeLiFePO4LiFePO4Tie
⚡ Usable Capacity (85%)2562 Wh245 WhBLUETTI
💰 Value (Wh/$)1.720.11BLUETTI
⚡ Charge Speed (Wh/min)6.07.2Anker
🔋 Apex 300 2764.8Wh
$1,749.00
🛒 Check Price
*2026 real-time price / inventory fluctuations
⚡ SOLIX C300 288Wh
$2,549.00
🛒 Check Price
*2026 real-time price / inventory fluctuations

⚡ Real‑Time Metrics Based on lab data

🔋 Usable Capacity (85%): 2562 Wh vs 245 Wh
💰 Value (Wh/$): 1.72 vs 0.11
⚡ Charge Speed (Wh/min): 6.0 vs 7.2

📊 Load Comparison · Usable Capacity Estimate

* Based on 85% inverter efficiency. Devices shown on bars.

Use CaseApex 300 2764.8WhSOLIX C300 288Wh🏆 Winner
🏕️ Camping⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐Anker
🚐 RV / Van⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐BLUETTI
🏠 Home Backup⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐BLUETTI

🧠 In‑Depth Analysis Lab Data

🔬 Capacity & Efficiency: BLUETTI offers 3014.0Wh (usable ~2562Wh), while Anker provides 288.0Wh (usable ~245Wh). BLUETTI holds the capacity advantage.

⚡ Charging Speed: BLUETTI charges at ~6.0 Wh/min, Anker at ~7.2 Wh/min. Anker refuels faster.

💰 Value Analysis: BLUETTI delivers 1.72 Wh/$, Anker gives 0.11 Wh/$. BLUETTI offers more watt-hours per dollar.

🏆 Verdict: This comparison is uniquely generated for BLUETTI vs Anker. Consider your priorities: capacity, speed, or value.