⚡ DELTA 3 Classic 1024Wh +220W Panel vs Apex 300 2764.8Wh 2026 Lab Test

🤖 One‑Liner · EcoFlow 9.2 Wh/min, solar 220W; BLUETTI 6.0 Wh/min. Value: 1.53 vs 1.72 Wh/$
SpecificationDELTA 3 Classic 1024Wh +220W PanelApex 300 2764.8Wh🏆 Winner
Capacity (Wh)1024.0 Wh3014.0 WhBLUETTI
Weight18.74 lbs83.8 lbsEcoFlow
Max Solar Input220W100WEcoFlow
AC Output1800W3840WBLUETTI
Battery TypeLiFePO4LiFePO4Tie
⚡ Usable Capacity (85%)870 Wh2562 WhBLUETTI
💰 Value (Wh/$)1.531.72BLUETTI
⚡ Charge Speed (Wh/min)9.26.0EcoFlow
🔋 DELTA 3 Classic 1024Wh +220W Panel
$669.00
🛒 Check Price
*2026 real-time price / inventory fluctuations
⚡ Apex 300 2764.8Wh
$1,749.00
🛒 Check Price
*2026 real-time price / inventory fluctuations

⚡ Real‑Time Metrics Based on lab data

🔋 Usable Capacity (85%): 870 Wh vs 2562 Wh
💰 Value (Wh/$): 1.53 vs 1.72
⚡ Charge Speed (Wh/min): 9.2 vs 6.0

📊 Load Comparison · Usable Capacity Estimate

* Based on 85% inverter efficiency. Devices shown on bars.

Use CaseDELTA 3 Classic 1024Wh +220W PanelApex 300 2764.8Wh🏆 Winner
🏕️ Camping⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐EcoFlow
🚐 RV / Van⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐BLUETTI
🏠 Home Backup⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐BLUETTI

🧠 In‑Depth Analysis Lab Data

🔬 Capacity & Efficiency: EcoFlow offers 1024.0Wh (usable ~870Wh), while BLUETTI provides 3014.0Wh (usable ~2562Wh). BLUETTI holds the capacity advantage.

⚡ Charging Speed: EcoFlow charges at ~9.2 Wh/min, BLUETTI at ~6.0 Wh/min. EcoFlow refuels faster.

💰 Value Analysis: EcoFlow delivers 1.53 Wh/$, BLUETTI gives 1.72 Wh/$. BLUETTI offers more watt-hours per dollar.

🏆 Verdict: This comparison is uniquely generated for EcoFlow vs BLUETTI. Consider your priorities: capacity, speed, or value.