| Specification | DELTA 3 Classic 1024Wh +400W Panel | Elite 100 V2 (Bio-based) 1024Wh | 🏆 Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity (Wh) | 2048.0 Wh | 1024.0 Wh | EcoFlow |
| Weight | 35.3 lbs | 25.3 lbs | BLUETTI |
| Max Solar Input | 400W | 100W | EcoFlow |
| AC Output | 1800W | 1800W | BLUETTI |
| Battery Type | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 | Tie |
| ⚡ Usable Capacity (85%) | 1741 Wh | 870 Wh | EcoFlow |
| 💰 Value (Wh/$) | 2.28 | 2.05 | EcoFlow |
| ⚡ Charge Speed (Wh/min) | 9.2 | 6.0 | EcoFlow |
* Based on 85% inverter efficiency. Devices shown on bars.
| Use Case | DELTA 3 Classic 1024Wh +400W Panel | Elite 100 V2 (Bio-based) 1024Wh | 🏆 Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏕️ Camping | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | BLUETTI |
| 🚐 RV / Van | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | EcoFlow |
| 🏠 Home Backup | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | EcoFlow |
🔬 Capacity & Efficiency: EcoFlow offers 2048.0Wh (usable ~1741Wh), while BLUETTI provides 1024.0Wh (usable ~870Wh). EcoFlow holds the capacity advantage.
⚡ Charging Speed: EcoFlow charges at ~9.2 Wh/min, BLUETTI at ~6.0 Wh/min. EcoFlow refuels faster.
💰 Value Analysis: EcoFlow delivers 2.28 Wh/$, BLUETTI gives 2.05 Wh/$. EcoFlow offers more watt-hours per dollar.
🏆 Verdict: This comparison is uniquely generated for EcoFlow vs BLUETTI. Consider your priorities: capacity, speed, or value.
🔁 People also compared (2026 Popular Comparisons):
📌 All links lead to internal comparisons with 2026 lab data.